an ingenious system of astronomy, the epicycle - a circle riding on a circle - to explain the
observed variations in speed and direction of the apparent motion of the Moon, Sun, and planets.
His plunder was that he 'listened' to the religiously imposed notion that with the
Earth being corrupt, the heaven must therefore be perfect, so that all movements
in the heavens must follow the path of circles that are perfect geometric
constructs. In order to make the theory (based on circles) match the observed
reality, Ptolemy created the epicycle. This became the basis for astronomy for
1,700 years. Of course no one could explain what would cause a planet to orbit around
an imaginary point in space that would itself be following a circular path around
another imaginary point half way between the Earth and still
another imaginary point that he called an equant. This concept, miraculously, came so close to
explain the observed motions that it was accepted as the law of the universe
until Johannes Kepler put it all aside and discovered in the planetary motions
an interplay of mass and gravity. It was Kepler, preceding Newton, who
discovered the principle of gravity and its laws. From this time on, the
Ptolemaic epicycles ruled no longer in astronomy. All of our modern space flight calculations
are still based on Kepler's discovery.
age of the 'epicycles' is not over
a different sort rule astronomy today. Just as once the perfect circle ruled in
the heavens as king for the basic laws, so today, the notion is king that
everything in the cosmos exists as the result of the force gravity and mass. In
order to make the observed evidence fit this new basic notion, a wide range of
modern epicycles have been created, such a black holes, dark matter, big bang
explosions, and of course also the nuclear fusion powered sun. All of these are
needed to make the evidence fit the theory. But as in the days of Ptolemy the
evidence still doesn't quite fit, in spite of all the fudge factor 'epicycles.'
example, the sun doesn't cooperate. Nobody can answer the question then, when
asked, how it it can be that sunspots, which reveal the lower layers of the sun
after an explosive mass ejection, show lower layers darker, not brighter
as the should be if the sun was powered from the inside by nuclear fusion. Nor can
anyone explain how it is possible in a gravity only universe that the solar-wind
particles speed up to millions of kilometers per hour, after they are ejected
from the solar surface, and how this acceleration happens against the force of
gravity that should slow it down. In such cases the 'epicycles' in the theory of the
gravity-only universe break down, while the troubling evidence is easily
explained in electric cosmology.
gravity-only theory cannot explain why we see the string-like alignment of stars, and galaxies, and entire
clusters of galaxies, like so many beads on a string. If gravity was the only
ruling factor in the cosmos, this should not happen. No reasons exists in the gravity-only universe for
such phenomena to occur, much less on any scale, from the smallest to the
Strings of stars (in a globular cluster
- M47) *
Strings of galaxies (in a galaxy cluster - aco3341) *
Strings of galaxy clusters (in our local super cluster - Virgo)
Strings of superclusters of galaxies (the local ones)
Arrays of strings of super clusters in the observable cosmos
which much more laying beyond the boundary of the observable.
phenomenon of string-like cosmic structures is observable everywhere and on all
universally observable phenomenon of string-like formation is an enigma in the
gravity-only entropic universe of fusion powered, isolated stars and suns, but
in the electric universe such phenomena are not only expected, but one would
be surprised if they didn't exist. Thus, in the real universe the epicycles of
the gravity-only theories break
here to take a look at the larger views of
both, the vast strings of galaxies in the the Capodimonte Deep Field (a composite
image of 35,000 galaxies), and the similar strings of stars in a high
resolution image of a portion of the M4 Globular Cluster by NASA's Hubble
space telescope. Truth is knowable.
look at the blow cutout images of the M4 Globular Cluster (A) and of the Capodimonte Deep Field
(B) and note with our eyes the plainly visible string formations of planets
and galaxies, respectively, and say to ourselves, "so what?"
(A - stars) (B -
We can also
look at what we see with the mind's eye and see in between the spaces of the
strings the electric power-stream that form the stings, which themselves are
invisible to the camera in most cases, and also to the eye. When we begin to see
with the mind's eye, we see principles in action reflected in the thing that
they physical eye observes. By seeing with the mind's eye, truth becomes
knowable, and this truth, in the cases above, reflects itself in countless
arenas, including the way we look at our own local sun. There, with the mind's
eye, we see in our Sun a star that is electrically powered with the same power
steams that we see with the mind's eye in the larger scenes above.
A cropped view
of the solar system - See
a larger view
see with the mind's eye, we also see that our planet Earth, orbiting in close proximity to
our electrically powered sun, is afloat in the concentrated electric
power-streams that light up our sun, which we then see as also being available to us for the
taking to supply our rather modest energy needs (in galactic terms).
at our world with the mind's eye, truth becomes knowable, whereby a more
truthful perception of our world and our universe, and with it of our future,
countless cases apparent where the 'epicycles' break down that uphold the
mindlessly imposed gravity-only perception of the universe. On this basis of
seeing with the mind's eye all the
fudge-factor break down, including the numerous 'epicycles' that have been
invented to justify imperial monetarism. The truth is
On the galactic
scale, dark matter, black holes, neutron stars, the Big Bang birth of the
universe, and so on, which have all been invented as fudge factors to conjure up
the needed mass
that makes gravitational models workable, will fall away as nonsense when seen
against the background of truth that is seen with the mind's eye beholding the
Some of the 'blind' theories even have it that a black hole resides at the center of every
galaxy that gives it the needed gravitational force that holds it together. These invented 'epicycles'
of course are necessary when the electromagnetic force of the universe, which is in reality more
than 36 orders of
magnitude stronger than gravity and doesn't diminish with the square of the
distance, is deemed not to exist, or is deemed not to be a factor. Thus, seeing
the truth (with the mind's eye) opens the scene to a whole new world that had
not been beheld before with the vision shackled by mental blindness.
this say about education?
We live in a
world in which truth is discarded as a factor. Countless diplomas are issued to
students that prove that they have learned efficiently how the universe does NOT
operate. Would one cite their "learned ignorance" then as an authority
for how to look at the world, as Nicolas of Cusa has termed the religious
playing with epicycles? Learned ignorance has become one the failures of the
modern educational system that no longer teaches the art of making discoveries
of fundamental universal principles, but has instead become a form of
politically correct obedience training.
advent of the Internet some of the obedience training is bypassed, and
invitations for discoveries are extended once again, though still faint in their
extent. One such case, related to the electric cosmology is the website,
where people share their discoveries related to the electric universe. A similar
economics and related politics is the LPAC website (The LaRouche Political Action
Committee - www.larouchepac.com) where
pioneering concepts of economics are presented.
As for the
electric cosmology, all that we really have available for us to go by is the
visible evidence that modern instrumentation presents to us, such as what we find on the NASA
and related websites. That's also all that anyone else has. So it becomes a question of
interpretation. The gravity-only cosmology
interprets the evidence one one way, and adjust the theory with the inclusion of 'epicycles.'
This is what is being taught in the schools. This does not mean
that advanced concepts of the electric cosmology that conform more closely to the evidence, are irrational,
simply because the schools issue no diplomas for anything outside of their own politically
imposed perceptions, whereby the diplomas become little more than
club-membership cards. The science of the electric cosmology exists outside
of this sphere that is paid for by the structures of empire and serves their
need. In fact, the science of the electric cosmology counters the structures of
empire, for which it has become slandered for its entire existence. Nevertheless
some progress has been made.
There was a time when people would have been prosecuted (and probably
were) for suggesting that our Sun is the central stillness in solar system,
instead of the God-created Earth being at the center, that all the heavens orbit around.
Ptolemy might have been in trouble had he raised his voice against that silly
We, today, are far
past this stage of small-minded perceptions, but we still cling to a lot of
similar, politically imposed
concepts, such as the gravity imposed entropy of everything, which keeps the mind
closed to the realization of the potential we have at hand, such as the
utilization of the vast electric energy resources that the universe has in store
for us and has placed within our grasp.
The Globular Clusters - Part 1
The Globular Clusters - Part 2
Energy visible on Earth
Energy visible in the Sun
Energy visible in the solar system
Energy visible in the galaxy - apocalypse NO!
Ice age YES!
Energy visible in the cosmos
to Know the Truth
more on empire, universe, energy, NASA, science, NAWAPA, music, world
with LPAC videos on the Nation, Science, Economics, and Empire