part 1 (Sunlight Paradox)
Indexed by graphic image
#2: Combined onto a single page
#3: Text only
part 2 (Climate Paradox)
Indexed by graphic image
#2: Combined onto a single page
#3: Text only
in PDF form
with images included
Fact versus Fiction
The climate fiction of
today includes many climate facts.
It includes the fact that
the Earth has been in a strong global warming trend from the end of the Little
Ice Age to 1998.
In this period many
glaciers have retreated, some enormously.
The Greenland Ice Sheet
too, has seen extensive melting around the edges, and measurable ice loss.
Antarctica has likewise
experienced massive ice losses as the result of the enormous global warming that
The arctic likewise, has
experienced massive losses of ice in the arctic ocean basin.
These are all facts. The
facts have been measured, photographed, explored, and they have been given rise
to frightful predictions. Here the pure fantasies, contrary to facts, begin to
enter the scene.
The climate fantasies
have linked the experienced global warming, which has been very real, to the
massive increase in global CO2 density in the air, which likewise has been very
real and has been increasing in synchronism with the global warming from the end
of the Little Ice Age to the present, as the cause for the global warming trend.
It is further fantasized
that the increase in CO2 density, which coincides with start of the industrial
revolution where large amounts of CO2 were increasingly emitted into the
atmosphere, is the cause for the global warming that has occurred.
It is tempting to make
these connections on the basis that CO2 has the physical characteristic to be a
greenhouse gas. CO2 is able to absorb radiated energy and to slowly retransmit
it in a scattered fashion.
Here, however, the facts
and the fantasies begin to diverge, because the increase in CO2, and the great
global warming, have each an unrelated origin, neither of which originates with
industrial activity, human living, and the burning of fuels for energy
Advances in science have
demonstrated with absolute physical measurements that the experienced global
warming has resulted exclusively from increased solar activity. This
relationship is clearly established with Carbon-14 measurements.
It has been discovered in
the 1940s that the interaction of solar cosmic-ray flux with the Earth's
atmosphere transforms a tiny portion of atmospheric nitrogen into the rare
isotope Carbon-14. In the process one of the protons of the nitrogen atoms is
being displaced by an energetic neutron. The transmutation creates a heavy
carbon atom that has two extra neutrons attached. The interaction of the solar
cosmic-ray flux with our atmosphere is the only natural source for Carbon-14
that is known to exist.
Since Carbon-14 is an
unnatural atomic element, it decays over time. The decay time is widely used for
carbon dating of historic organic material. The measurement of Carbon-14 is also
used as a direct precise measurement of the relative solar activity and its
variations over time.
The measurements show
that in historic cold times, such as the Maunder Minimum of the Little Ice Age
that is known to have been an extremely weak period on solar activity, coincides
with larger volumes of Carbon-14 measured in samples from this time. This means
that during these extreme cold periods, the solar cosmic-ray flux was
The measured relationship
is confirmed with the experimentally demonstrated fact that cosmic-ray
interaction increases cloudiness. When during the CLOUD experiment at the CERN
labs in Europe artificial cosmic rays were injected into a test chamber, the
water vapor nucleation went straight up and off the chart.
The experiment proved in
principle that cosmic-ray interaction increases cloudiness. It is self-evident
of course, that increased cloudiness reflects increased amounts of incoming
solar radiation back into space, which thereby is lost to us, and results in
It is self-evident,
therefore, that the deep cold of the Little Ice Age, and the Great Global
Warming afterwards, had both their origin located exclusively in the Sun.
The Little Ice Age is
thereby demonstrated to be coincident with low solar activity, measured in
extremely low sunspot numbers, which is also measured in extremely high
Carbon-14 density values at the time that are a direct measurement of the
cosmic-ray flux at the time, which thereby becomes a measure of cloudiness that
has caused the the Little Ice Age cooling. These interlocked measurements place
the great climate changes on Earth, both towards cold times and warm times,
directly into the court of the Sun.
The CO2 carbon gas is not
a causative factor on this huge scene of the climate dynamics, where the Sun
itself is demonstrably the driving factor for the climate change on Earth.
So what about the CO2
increase then? Has it no effect at all? The answer is that it has no effect, or
ever had, and never will.
While CO2 is a greenhouse
gas by its physical characteristic, its total effect among all the greenhouse
gases and greenhouse effects, is roughly a millions of the whole.
The total greenhouse
effect is caused by a combination of the absorption of solar energy in the
Earth's atmosphere, and the retention of it by the atmosphere.
It is a generally
recognized fact that 43% of the heat budget of the atmosphere is generated from
incoming sunlight being absorbed in the atmosphere, 9% is from energy being
reflected back from the ground, and 48% is latent heat released by the
cloud-forming process. The heat that is released is the heat that has been
invested in the process of evaporating water into vapor.
If you take a kettle of
water and boil it away into steam, a considerable amount of energy is required
to accomplish the transformation. When the steam is condensed back to liquid
form, the invested heat is released. In the atmosphere, this happens in the
cloud-forming process. This typically happens at high elevations that are the
colder regions of the atmosphere where a large portion of the generated heat is
cooled-off into space.
The CO2 carbon gas plays
no causative role in either of these three processes.
For starters, the
absorption characteristic of CO2 is 10 times lower than that of water vapor,
which is 100 times more densely present and is active on a vastly wider
spectrum. In addition, oxygen is also a powerful greenhouse gas, which is 575
times more densely present in the atmosphere. In addition to all of that, the
Rayleigh scattering effect of incoming sunlight adds to the atmospheric heat
budget. The effect is caused by light interacting with molecular oxygen and
nitrogen which causes a strongly diffused radiation in the sky. If it wasn't for
this effect, the sky would be black. The CO2 effect in all of this, in the
combined absorption of incoming sunlight is infinitesimal.
In the 9% portion of the
solar energy that is radiated back from the ground as outgoing radiation, the
narrow absorption band of CO2 is vastly overshadowed by the 10 times more
efficient water vapor that is 100 times more densely present in the atmosphere
and is effective over a much wider range of the spectrum.
The bottom line is, that
the CO2 contribution to the greenhouse effect, in both the incoming and outgoing
energy flow, is so minuscule that it is not actually physically measurable. It
is likely in the range of a millionth part of it, if that.
The big determining
factor is cloudiness. Cloudiness reflects a portion of the incoming sunlight
back into space, and the water-vapor in the clouds absorbs huge amounts of
incoming solar energy that is retained in the clouds and is largely cooled back
Under heavy cloudiness
the solar radiation received on the ground is 9 times less than under a
Cloudiness has a strong
feedback effect on the climate. When the climate cools, less water vapor is
produced, which reduces cloudiness, and re-warmth the climate. CO2 has no effect
on it, and even if it had an effect, miraculously, which is physically
impossible, the effect would be offset by the climate dynamics. Only when the
overall cloudiness is affected in a big way by changing solar activity, are big
changes forced in the climate dynamics.
These interlocked facts
prove that CO2, no matter what it's atmospheric density may be, is a zero factor
in the climate equation, and always has been that, and will be so.
In geologic history when
the atmospheric concentration of CO2 had been 10 to 20 times more dense than it
is today, not just a few percent, immense ice ages have occurred in spite of the
huge CO2 concentrations.
In addition to all that,
the current increase in CO2 isn't manmade anyway. The current increase is the
result of high-levels of CO2 absorption into the oceans during the cold period
of the Little Ice Age. CO2 is absorbed strongly in the cold waters of the polar
regions, from where it is circulated back into the tropical waters by the
conveyor belt of the cold deep-ocean currents. The currents move slowly, so that
the CO2 that rides in these currents from the cold polar waters, arrive back in
the atmosphere with a time delay of 350 to a thousand years.
In addition, less CO2 is
dissolved into the oceans in warm periods, which boosts the CO2 increase.
The current CO2 increase
is a reflection of both factors. It has nothing to do with industrial activity,
or manmade increases by the burning of carbon fuels.
The current worldwide
manmade CO2 emission adds slightly over 1% of the total CO2 volume into the
global atmosphere, each year. Of the global volume, a third gets recycled every
year, and a third of that gets recycled through the oceans with a long-long
cycle time. The tiny 1% portion that results from manmade causes gets lost in
the huge recycling volume.
It would be cause for
celebration if the human effects would significantly increase the atmospheric
CO2 density. The Earth is CO2 starved. All plants need CO2 to live, and we need
the plants for our food. In geologic time, we have the lowest CO2 density that
may have ever existed. The CO2 starvation is so severe, that a mere doubling of
the CO2 density in greenhouse operations results in a 50% increase in plant
growth. We need a 10-fold increase in Global CO2 density to invigorate the
biosphere and to fortify it against the increasing CO2 absorption into the
oceans that occur during the Ice Age glaciation times. With the next Ice Age
being potentially as close as 30 years from the present, large scale efforts
should be made to extract dissolved CO2 from the deep ocean currents and pools.
We need a 1,000% increase, and we need it relatively fast. We definitely don't
need a CO2 density reduction.
Nor do we need to worry
about global warming. The Great Global Warming that the Sun gave us from the end
of the Little Ice Age to 1998, is already over. The Earth is getting colder. The
solar activity is getting weaker. The solar cycles are fast diminishing. Even
the solar wind is diminishing. The next Little Ice Age may be upon us in the
2020s, setting the stage for the next big Ice Age to start in the 2050s. The
Great Global Warming lives on only in dreaming. The time has come to awake.
imposing the dreaming?
enemy of empire is the development of humanity, for which science and truth is
the driving force as a single package for the advance of civilization. Empire
aims to defend itself with modern irregular warfare, by grinding humanity into
the dust. The climate card is just one card in the deck of the masters of
empire, whoever they may be. The deck is aimed at the destruction of humanity,
and wherever possible with the destruction of science and truth, and the
reduction of the mind to ever-lower levels of infantile 'thinking' by means of
CO2 is not a
climate factor in the real world. It never will be that. This fact is as plain
as the sunrise each morning. Nor is the modern CO2 increase in the world,
manmade, such as by industrial activity and energy use. This fact too, is as
plain as day. However, huge, contrary lies have been spouted for 40 years in the
climate theatres where everything is made up to serve the intended degenerating
scare campaigns. The effect of those 40 years of relentless mental warfare have
fostered a deep shame in the soul, a shame of one being alive as a human being,
as a burden to the Earth, etc. To those living in this cultivated comatose
state, the nuclear war terror card isn't a big issue anymore, or economic
collapse, or mass murder. The blindness of being mentally asleep also hides the
really critical issue, the giant existential issue, which is the near Ice Age
before us in 30 years. In addition, the sleep state also hides critical economic
issues, such as for example the issue of restoring the Glass Steagall bank
protection legislation as an element of the strategic defence of nations.
Asleep, and ruminating on issues of lies, society has been rendered functionally
strategic defence of mankind needs to begin at the root. It needs to begin with
honest science, defending humanity with truth, in order to disable the entire
deck of the cards of subversive warfare as a single issue. This means that the
climate issue, technically, is a none issue, and that modern irregular warfare,
where the climate card is played with lies as a part of a larger deck, is the
It makes no
sense in this context to split the deck up into separate single issues, except
to let the exposure of the climate fraud, expose the entire deck as fraud, by
awake! The CO2 carbon gas is not a climate factor. It never was or ever will be. That's as plain as the sunrise each morning. Nor is the ongoing CO2 increase manmade. That's as plain as day, too. The facts are so self-evident that you only need to open your eyes just a little. If you
doubt this, watch this video.
by Ludwig van Beethoven - Symphony #9 (opus 125) 4th movement (choral) based on
the poem, "Ode to Joy" by Friedrich Schiller. The music was performed and
recorded by the Schiller Institute in Germany on March 24, 2010 as a part of a political
and cultural event to demonstrate and to promote the scientifically correct Mozart
tuning (and later the Verdi tuning) of C=256. The performance is available on YouTube in 2 parts:
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YDVog236Bc
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uz30g2GRUs
also see: http://www.schillerinstitute.org/music/revolution.html
the year 1907, a coalition of interests launched a massive slander campaign,
primarily in the press, against America's foremost scientific and spiritual
pioneer, Mary Baker Eddy, the discoverer and founder of Christian Science. A
part of the campaign, in conjunction with the press, was a legal attempt at
declaring her to be incompetent, in what became known as the Next Friend's suit.
How did the spiritual pioneer defend herself? Her layers had prepared a brief in
her defence, to be submitted to the court. After a lengthy deliberation she
asked that the brief be not submitted. In response, the court appointed a master
to visit her, to ascertain the truth, who evidently found the charges
groundless, so that the case was simply left to die. However, she did mount an
appropriate defence to protect the real target in this case, which evidently was
not her person, but humanity as a whole. Society would be deprived of her
profound achievement by the weight of the slander. She launched an appropriately
massive defence of humanity by founding her own press, at the age of 86, which
she named, "The Christian Science Monitor," with the charge, "To
bless al mankind and to injure none." She defended mankind by saying in
essence, "Put on your beautiful garments," the garments of truth,
science, and love, in order that the intentions of mental malpractice cannot
harm you. With this defence the slander ceased, and those who had promoted it,
with some big names among them, retracted themselves with shame, at least some
In her case
the slander campaign was short lived, probably just a few months in duration. In
comparison, the modern campaign that slanders humanity as an incompetent climate
villain and a beastly burden on the Earth for which depopulation is demanded,
has been going on for more than 40 years. In this case too, the slander is groundless,
as plain and obvious physical evidence indicates, and tens of thousands of
people with scientific and academic backgrounds have testified repeatedly.
Nevertheless the attack on humanity continues with evermore cries for economic
suicide and depopulation being directed against the soul of humanity. The Paris
Climate Change Conference is slated to be the greatest-ever mental malpractice
mass-force event with 50,000 people in attendance; in the nature of the
Nuremberg mass-rallies that were dubbed rallies for peace. Who is defending
humanity? Who inspires mankind to put on its beautiful garments of truth,
science, and love in defence of humanity? We are humanity, all of us together.
We are the greatest manifest of life on this planet, and the greatest creative
power with a mind that has the resources in itself to protect itself against all
forms of mass-mental-malpractice, and thereby protect its future. Some day this
will be recognized, unless the terror orgy of nuclear war is allowed to become
real and ends the human journey
Man: A critical question. "Which profession provides the highest service to God, and to man in God's image? Is it the service of the clergy, the scientists, or the politicians?"
the answer be? There can only be one answer.
The clergy speaks about the glory of God, and of man in the image of God. But
the clergy speaks only words. The scientist puts into practice what the clergy merely hints at. The scientist searches for fundamental principles and applies them to create a civilization in which humanity can live more richly and fully than it would otherwise be able to live. The scientist opens the gate to the truth that the clergy merely dreams about. Thus, the scientist provides a higher service. More important, however, is the work of the politician that creates the institutions, which enable the scientists to work and the clergy to speak. Without creating institutions of government committed to advancing the welfare of the whole of society, the fruition of the dreams of the clergy and the ideas of the scientists cannot be realized. Without the politician dedicated to the highest principles, society remains a collection of slaves. Thus, the highest tribute falls upon the politician.
there remains yet one critical aspect to be considered. The supreme tribute must
be bestowed on the individual human being, on Man the Living the Image of God. The church serves to define it. Divine Science serves to empower it. It is the politician's task to stoke the furnace and protect the church and to protect science, but the power in this world rests with Man for the very glory of God. If
the human being - the humanity in man - is slandered, God is slandered and civilization diminishes and falls apart. If that happens, the Principle of the Universe is slandered instead of being expressed. Then the light goes out in the world. Every sting of hate is a slap in the face of God. Every loving thought and gesture,
in contrast, is the reflection of God bringing a light to this world that can never truly
dim. That's something to be considered, isn't it?
are invited to consider a donation in support of this work