The
observed motions of stars in our galaxy project a radically different
principle than the known
universal principle of orbital mechanics of the Kepler-discovered laws
of planetary motion. Since this is the case a totally different motivating force is
evident than that of gravity. On this basis
Kepler refutes the theory of orbiting stars and orbiting solar systems around
the galactic centers, because the observed movements do not agree with his discovered gravity-based principles.
The observed motions of stars in our galaxies, when seen as orbital motions
in the context of Kepler's discovered orbital principles, are so vastly out
of line with these principles that they cannot be rationally reconciled as
such, which simply means that the entire theory of orbiting stars has no
foundation to stand on. The theorized phenomena of orbiting stars is simply not possible, and
therefore its is not happening. Anyone clinging to the theory of orbiting
stars is guilty of the denial of Kepler, and the denial of humanity itself.
Let's
look at the details that set the planetary motions apart from the galactic
motions. We see a contrasting difference like night and day.
For
example, the observed orbital velocity of the planets in our solar system is
such that the average orbital velocity of the planets diminish with their
distance from the Sun.
For Mercury,
the innermost planet at 0.387 AU distance, the orbital velocity is 47.9 Km/sec.
This speed compares with the orbital velocity of 4.74 KM/sec for Pluto, the
outermost planet at 39.4 AU average distance from the Sun. (see
Table) We see in the table of the solar system a roughly 10-fold
difference in orbital velocity across the board, for a 100-fold difference in
distance between the outmost and innermost planet.
If one plots
all of the planet's orbital velocity in respect to their distance an exponentially
declining curve results, as shown below.
The observed orbital
velocity (speed) keeps the planets roughly 70% below the theoretical escape velocity for their distance from the
Sun (respective of the diminishing gravitational force on the planets, which
diminishes with the square of the distance). All this accords perfectly with
the Kepler-discovered laws.
Now
compare these observed relationships, with
the observed motions of stars in our galaxy (a typical spiral galaxy).
Curve A is the once predicted speed relationship, and curve B represents
what has been actually observed.
In this
comparison nothing agrees anymore on the galactic scale with the
Kepler-discovered gravitational dynamics. The motions of the stars in our
galaxy don't reflect
any of the discovered principles as if the Kepler-discovered principles of
gravitational dynamics do not apply on the galactic scale. This is
so, because the principles of gravitational mechanics actually do not apply on the galactic
scale, because gravity is too weak a force to have an effect on the galactic
scale of dimensions, for to be applicable the galactic central gravity would have to reach across a distance of 50,000 light years, which is not
possible as the required concentration of mass is not possible that would be
required to produce such an immense force of gravity. But more importantly the observed pattern of motions of stars in our
galaxy is likewise so radically different that we evidence here of two
totally different operating dynamics, which by their evident characteristic
are opposite in nature.
Whereas in the solar system, the planet with closest
distance to the gravitational center orbits with the greatest velocity -
which it
has to, or else it would be pulled into the Sun by its gravity - the opposite
happens on the galactic scale. In the
galaxy the stars nearest the center are observed to
have the slowest motion, instead of the fastest motions. If the galaxy was a gravitational system, those
innermost stars would have been consumed. They would have never existed.
While in
the solar system the orbital velocity diminishes with the planet's distance
from the Sun (or else the planets would escape the solar system), the observed velocity of stars in our galaxy is instead
increasing with their distance from the galactic center, which tells us
again that a totally different dynamic system is operating in the galaxy,
other than gravitational dynamics (or else the stars would escape the galaxy
by centrifugal force).
A totally different
dynamic process is evidently operating on the galactic scale than what
Kepler observed in gravitational dynamics. The
observed increase in the velocity of stars levels out after about 10% of the distance to the 'edge'
of the galaxy with the speed-curve remaining flat from this point on as
shown above. An orbital system cannot produce the kind of phenomena that are
observed in the galaxy. The perception that a galaxy is a structure of
orbiting stars involves a total denial of of the dynamics of Kepler's
discovery and what is observed in the solar system related to these
discoveries. What are assumed to be orbital motions are evidently not
orbital motions as they don't match the known characteristics, but are
motions resulting from different dynamics.
If the
observed galactic pattern would be applied to our solar system as orbital
motions, not a single
planet would be in orbit. The bottom line is that the theory of orbiting
stars doesn't have a principle to stand on.
For
example, as I stated before, the kind of massive
gravity is physically not possible that would be required to effectively reach across the
galactic distance of 50,000
light years and have a hold on a star moving 5 times the velocity of
Mercury. Such orbital relationships are physical impossibilities. The amount
of gravity that would be required to produce this strong hold over such a
vast distance is impossible to even imagine as the effective force of
gravity diminishes with the square of
the distance.
No evidence exists that the gravity of our sun as an effective
force extends even as far as the inner edge of the Oort Cloud that surrounds
the solar system at a distance of less than a single light year. And our sun
is massive. It contains 99.9% of the mass of the entire solar system. The theory
of a gravitational orbiting system that extends across 50,000 light years
would require a minimal central mass roughly three billion times the mass of our
sun. That kind of mass-accumulation is possible only in the world of dreams
and in decapitated science where black holes are imagined up as 'epicycles' to
explain a theory that has no foundation in principle. And even if the
super-massive black hole that is theoretically not possible either, would
miraculously exist with the mass of three billion suns, an orbiting system on the galactic scale
would still not be possible. If the gravitational pull of it was so enormous
that it
would hold onto a star orbiting at 250 km/sec at a distance of 50,000 light
years from it, all the close-in stars would have to orbit at velocities many
times exceeding the speed of light, which too, is physically not possible.
In order
to rescue the theory of orbiting stars, a few more 'epicycles' have over the
years been invented
that are supposed to make the theory possible. The main additional
'epicycle' is the supposed existence of dark matter that is not physically
detectable, but which theoretically adds to the gravitational equation.
It is
interesting to note that the 'epicycles,' such as black holes, dark matter,
and indeed the Big-Bang theory itself that they are a part of, originated in the
workshops of imperially dominated science where nothing greater than the
force of gravity is allowed to rule. That's where the enigma evidently
originated, of orbiting stars, as no other force is allowed to be recognized
there as a motivating force for the motions of the stars observed in our galaxy.
If one breaks through the decapitating barrier that imprisons science, a
rather simple explanation for the motion of stars in a galaxy comes readily
into view. The motivating force for the galactic phenomena is evidently the
electromagnetic force of the universe. The electro-magnetic force is known
to be up to 36 orders of magnitude stronger than the force of gravity, and
its effectiveness does not diminish with the square of the distance as does
gravity. It is a force with demonstrated galactic and intergalactic reach.
No 'epicycles' are needed to explain the observed movements of stars in our
galaxy. The movements are then no longer an enigma of orbital mechanics that
cannot be explained with the principles applicable to orbital dynamics, but
do instead reflect the well-known principles of the electromagnetic force
and its universal manifestations, all of which can be replicated and
experimentally demonstrated in the laboratory setting. The observed
movements of stars is totally consistent with these known and understood
principles.
For
example: It is well known that if an electric current is passed through two
closely spaced wires in the same direction the wires magnetically attract
each other by what is called the Lorentz force. The movement of electric
currents always create a magnetic field. Such movements also occur in space,
which is far from being empty, but is pervaded with free-flowing plasma
particles that all have an electric charge. The movement of the electric
currents in the plasma in space (known as Birkeland currents) have been
discovered to pinch upon each other by the Lorentz force, whereby the
current streams become self-aligned into highly concentrated streams of
electric currents. Such currents become self-propagating over large
distances in space where more than 99.99% of the mass of the universe is
recognized to be located in the form of electrically charged plasma. Since
the movement of an electric current creates a magnetic field around itself,
perpendicular to its flow, the field aligned currents in plasma are rotating
with it. This phenomenon can also be observed in laboratory experiments. In
a galaxy the field aligned currents are pinched together into vast
concentrated plasma streams that form the arms of the galaxies, in which the
stars of the galaxies are concentrated, and by which they are powered
(rather than by nuclear fusion).
The
observed velocity of movements of stars throughout the galaxy is nearly
uniform at app. 250 Km/sec whereby the observed velocity closely reflects
the typical observed velocity of the movement of plasma in near-earth space,
such as the solar winds (200 to 800 Km/sec) and the movement in the
heliospheric current sheet at app. 300 Km/sec. By this close correlation the
motion of stars in our galaxy reveal themselves as not being orbital
phenomena, but merely the effect of the ever-rotating magnetic fields that
pinch-align the plasma currents.
It is
self-evident why the existence of electric currents in space is banished
from the field of physical science by imperial dictate that largely controls
the dynamics of science along the Wellsian/Fabian doctrine. Just imagine if
the recognition of electric currents in space was not suppressed, but the
knowledge of it would be utilized with appropriate technologies, then the
chokehold that empire presently has on energy supplies and thereby on the
economic pulse of humanity, would vanish, blowing away with the dawning of
an energy-rich renaissance for humanity.
Our
interface to the cosmic electric energy streams is primarily through the
ionosphere, which is so intensely energy-rich that it powers the immensely
energetic phenomena of hurricanes, tornadoes, and the worldwide lightening
shows that all dwarf our puny energy production from fusil fuels and nuclear
power. The masters of empire have a strong reasons for keeping this energy
source hidden as a means for protecting the system of oligarchic looting. H.
G. Wells had already recognized back in his time that it is critical for the
oligarchic system to keep science and technology dumb and decapitated. The
restricting of all of the cosmic phenomena to be recognized as
gravity-forced phenomena is evidently the path that has been imposed on
science. History bears this out.
For
example,the recognition of electric power streams in space goes back to the
scientific work of the Norwegian scientist Kristian Olaf Birkeland (1867 –
1917) who had organized a number of expeditions to Norway's high-latitude
regions where he established observatories under the auroral regions to
collect magnetic field data. The results of his Polar Expedition conducted
in the 1899 / 1900 timeframe contained the first solid scientific
determination of the pattern of electric currents induced in the polar
region, measured by ground magnetic field measurements. From this point on
electric power in space was no longer an enigma, but a rigorously proved
reality. It was Birkeland who, based on his observations, pioneered the
fixing of nitrogen from the air with accelerated electrons for the
commercial production of fertilizer (the Birkeland-Eyde process).
The
Big-Bang theory in which the electric force is given no place, where only
gravity rules, was evidently developed as a counterforce to put the
discovered reality of cosmic electricity back into the bottle of obscurity.
The Big-Bang was invented in the 1930s after Edwin Hubble had discovered
that far away galaxies were associated with a visible redshift proportional
to their distance that was interpreted to indicate that the distant galaxies
and clusters of galaxies were moving away from our vantage point, and that
the farther away they were located, the greater was the apparent velocity of
their movement away from us.
The
effect of the Big-Bang evidently was as expected. It put the lid on every
form of science related to space-based electric energy phenomena. Also, as
one might expect in the speculative whirlwind, no one seemed disturbed that
the Earth was once again seen to be the center of the Universe. The Swedish
plasma physicist, Hannes Alfvén almost stood alone in the field of
scientific opposition. He regarded the Big Bang theory as a scientific myth
resulting from convoluted extrapolation about the origin of the universe
from mathematical theories developed on the blackboard, rather than theories
drawn from readily knowable and known observable physical phenomena. Alfven
became famous for his pioneering contributions to the science of solar
plasma physics, which may have laid the foundation for the electric-sun
model pioneered in 1972 by the American Electrical engineer Ralph Juergens
who introduced the concept of the electrically powered Sun at this time.
Though his calculation where too minimal to support the phenomenon, the
electric power density evidently does exist in ample supply to justify such
a theory. Today, vastly more observable evidence exists for the model of the
externally powered electric sun, than for the model of the gravity-forced
fusion-powered sun.
The
significance of this development is that it places a near infinite electric-energy potential at our
doorstep, ready-made for our utilization. Naturally, a huge wave of opposition has
been stirred up against the evident cosmic energy reality that requires but
a technological step of development for its practical implementation. It is
here in our own denial of an unspeakably energy-rich potential renaissance,
where we find the most tragic consequences of the denial of Kepler on which
this tragic denial of our present potential rests.
Apart from the
Big-Bang theory that proved to be highly successful in blocking the
development of scientific honesty in cosmology, the related theory of a galaxy of orbiting stars fulfills the
same Wellsian/Fabian science-bending objective. The two are identical in
their mythical manner as no real principles exists that
could logically support either theory.
Here
Kepler comes to the scene again. What Kepler had recognized as universal
laws has been thrown out of the window on the galactic scale as an irritant
against doctrine. Ironically, Johannes Kepler who had discovered the
principle of universal gravity back in the early 1600s, is now effectively
ruled as non-applicable by the advocates of the gravity-forced galactic
dynamics, such as the theory of orbiting stars, and the stars being entropically
powered by a gravity forced internal fusion process for which likewise no
evidence exists except in the world of mythological theories.
It is a
tragic irony that the leading admirers of Kepler's scientific discoverers
stand boldly before the world as the effective deniers of his discoveries by
their championing the gravity-forced galaxy with orbiting stars (a physical
impossibility according to universal principle) as if Kepler never existed
and the operating principle of universal gravitation had never been
discovered. It is an ironic twist of our twisted science that we throw
Kepler's discoveries that are fully observable out of the window by
imagining the myth of orbiting stars that cannot be observed since a span of
250 million years would be required to observe a single orbit. What are assumed
to be gravitational orbits are evidently motions resulting from 'localized'
electric phenomena that can be observed in the small in laboratory
experiments. The irony is that modern so-called science is throwing away the
known, knowable, and observable aspects of the universe for the sake of a theory
that is not verifiable and observable, but which is required for political
objectives to hide the real potential of the universe and with it humanity,
and to conjure up apocalyptic theories of galactic forced extinction cycles
to frighten children with.
It is sad to see this
type of tragedy being promoted by the LaRouche
science basement team as the numerous involved science contradiction
discredit the valuable
contributions the LaRouche political Action Committee is offering the world
in the sphere of economic science and political science. It is difficult to organize society
around LaRouche's contributions in these areas with the clearly evident
contradictions in physical science standing in the way, which to add to the
tragedy is used for apocalyptic terrorizing.
The
situation has become especially tragic in modern time when the economic
breakdown that LaRouche had accurately forecast as a necessary end-result
for as long as the oligarchic system, misnamed an economic system, the
system of empire, remains in control, as it does, which has now driven the
world to the brink of nuclear war. While the denial of Kepler appears
trivial in comparison, it is vastly more than that. The galactic apocalyptic
crisis predictions that the LaRouche science team promotes, based on
imagined changing conditions as our solar system is dreamed to be orbiting into
a different arm of the galaxy, and out of another. The theory is so far off in the land of mysticism that the
resulting air of mysticism puts a shadow over everything else that is build
thereon, and overshadows the valuable contributions the LaRouche
organization has made and is making. But most tragic of all, this science
denial dreaming is depriving humanity of the infinite cosmic-electric energy
that the universe has laid at our feed, which mystified decapitated science
prevents us from opening our 'eyes' to.
That the
orbiting-stars theory exists only in fantasy land is self-evident without
anyone having to understand the resulting contradiction with Kepler, and
still the mystification goes on, tragically.
We
have seen in recent times the development of weather patterns that are
reminiscent to what has been experienced back during the period of the
Little Ice Age. But it is irrational to propose that this development over
the last dozen years is the sudden result of the solar system changing its orbital
position within a cycle spanning 62 million years? Nothing that happens on
this immensely long time-scale of tens of millions of years can be
rationally blamed for the rapidly changing short-term events spanning just a
few decades, as we have experienced in recent years. Far simpler reasons
for these short-term events are known and have been documented.
Likewise
is it irrational to blame the sudden increase in earthquake activity that we
have seen since 1998 on the effect of a 62 million year galactic solar orbit
cycle. While the mystic proposition may seem rational in a cosmology where
only gravity is the governing force, so that all phenomena need to have a
gravity-mechanical origin, the resulting projections make no sense to the
rational mind to which it is hard, and next to impossible, to organize people
around such dreamscapes as 62 million year cycles producing apocalyptic
short-term events over a time scale of just decades. This doesn't mean that a rational exploration
for the increase in earthquakes isn't possible. It is actually rather simple
to recognize the cause for this increase when one steps away from the gravity-only entrapment of
science, and thereby the entrapment of the mind.
Of
course, the entrapment is intentional. The effect of resulting science contradiction,
on those who remain trapped, is precisely
what the Wellsian and Fabian objective has been from the beginning, and
still is to the present day. This long-standing objective and its doctrine still
stands today. The effect too, remains the same. Most champions in
modern science remain trapped by the movements of the oligarchic
doctrine that renders the victims of imprisoned science as qualified
contenders for the Wellsian-Fabian Award for Excellence in Scientific
Mysticism and Obstruction of Reality.
The
tragedy of the oligarchic entrapment that has captivated the best of us has
made impotent victims of us all, is not specific to any group, ideology,
scientific discipline, or religious orientation, but is the universal
outcome of the oligarchic system having operated in the world for long
periods essentially unopposed. It has created a culture of masters and
subjects, of elite and obedient followers, instead of a culture of free
human beings cooperating for their common welfare and secure future.
In order
to block the equally irrational mysticism about a survivable endless bailout
looting, or a survivable thermonuclear World War III, or a survivable total
economic breakdown under imperial monetarist control, a strong universal
commitment to reality is needed, instead of the opposite of quietly
remaining trapped. The oligarchic mysticism should be scrapped on all
fronts, especially in the sciences, instead of it being promoted there, to
the point that the entire oligarchic system becomes terminated including its
expression in the form of empire.
For how
long do you think we will be able to survive in our mystic dreaming, without this necessary steps
towards the freedom of humanity being taken?
