Text and images transcript of the video The Plasma Core, Segment 1: Earth by Rolf Witzsche 

The Plasma Core, Segment 1: Earth

Click on the images for a larger view




Something is tragically wrong with the mainstream perception of the makeup of the Earth, and the planets in general. The perception is that the core of the Earth is largely a ball of iron, for more than half of its diameter, surrounded by superheated magma that hasn't yet cooled after billions of years, and is crowned with a thin crust of rocks.




The mainstream theory has it that the planets had condensed from primordial dust of the Big Bang explosion that brought the universe into being, and that this dust conveniently congregated into a protoplanetary disk in which the planets were born. So the theory goes.

The hydrogen atoms in space are said to have gathered together into a large sphere of gas that became compression heated, so intensely that atomic fusion reactions began to occur that lit up the gas sphere to become the Sun. Then, whatever primordial material was left over, after Sun was born, especially all the heavy stuff, like iron, carbon. silicone, and so on, is said to have condensed into planets nearby the Sun, like Mercury, Venus, the Earth, and Mars.




 And all of that is said to have happened is such a manner that the planets were all miraculously formed within a narrow plane that became the planetary ecliptic, and that they where magically accelerated to the right speed so that they would orbit around the Sun, with all of them orbiting in the same direction. That's the story that is being told.

But wait a minute! Does that make sense?




Is it reasonable to assume that our minuscule little Earth should have captured mostly the heavy elements, and that the nearby Sun should have captured only gases, especially hydrogen, the lightest of all the gases?

This doesn't make sense, nor is it actually possible, is it?




If the creation of the solar system really happened by accretion, all the heavy stuff would have been gobbled up by the Sun, the big center of gravity. In this case, the Sun would own all the heavy elements, with nothing much left over to condense into planets. The Sun would have the heavy core of iron then, and not the Earth.. Of course, that's not possible either, nor did it happen.




So, what's the real story? How could the Earth become what it is, in a way that is actually feasible.

The real story would also have to be a story that includes some real answers as to why the planets actually exist and orbit the Sun, and all of them in the same ecliptic plain, and in the same direction,




and all being perfectly spaced from one another in a geometric progression, as Johannes Kepler had discovered already back in 1600s.




Is a story that combines these numerous features really possible, without magic?

Yes, such a story is possible. However, it gives the planets a totally different 'face' so to speak, that is dramatically different than the mainstream concept.




This video series explores a wide range of subjects.



Segment 1

#1 What is a plasma sphere?

#2 Why do planets form around a plasma sphere, exclusively?

#3 What is building up pressure within the plasma core.



Plasma Core Principle, Examples.

Segment 2

#1 World-Historic seismic and volcanic events 2004 - 2011.

#2 Storms after the calm - 2015 - 2019.

#3 Big events, keyed to solar weak times.

Segment 3

#4 Paradox of the "too heavy" dinosaurs.

#5 The Earth's variable surface-gravity and size.

#6 The Sun a naked plasma core - example Mini-Novas.

All of this is New






The mainstream concept doesn't make any sense anyway. We are taught in the schools to imagine the Earth to have at its center a core of iron that is 7,000 kilometers wide, more than twice as wide as the moon, some of it in solid form, and some of it in liquid form. Since the origin of such a huge lump of iron is a mystery, it probably doesn't really exist.

But then, what does exist at the centre of the Earth?

Ironically, the answer is not mysterious. The answer is simple and profound, with extremely large implications for our living on the Earth. But let me warn you, this answer is not rooted in mechanistic theories.




Question # 1 What is a Plasma Sphere?




To begin with, let's have a look at how the solar system operates. We have plenty of evidence on hand that our Sun, that is located at the center of the solar system, is not made up of atomic elements at all, but is a plasma star.




I have made several videos about that. This feature is critical. It is also critical for the Earth.




As a plasma star our Sun is externally powered by streams of interstellar plasma flowing onto it. Plasma is the term for atomic particles that are not bound into atoms, but are free-flowing in space and carry an electric charge.

As carriers of an electric charge, plasma is affected by electromagnetic principles. When flowing in space, the movement of the electric particles creates magnetic fields around them. The magnetic fields interact and draw the moving plasma particles towards each other. Plasma streams thereby become self-concentrating electric streams. The effect is such that a magnetic pinching happens that is self-amplifying., because the tighter that plasma becomes drawn together, the stronger become the magnetic fields that facilitate the process.




This self-increasing concentration continues to the point when the pinching becomes so tight that the magnetic fields tangle up.




When this happens another magnetic process begins that concentrates the flowing plasma stream evermore extremely, and then focuses it all, in super-concentrated form, onto a Plasma Sun.

The researcher, David LaPoint, who had explored the process in great detail, had termed the focusing magnetic fields, the Primer Fields, which he became known for.




While the Sun consumes some plasma, as it combines the plasma particles into atomic elements in magnetic reactions, the unused plasma that is now less dense, flows on in the reverse of the process.




The complimentary nature of the Primer Fields has been verified in high-energy experiments at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, directed by Anthony Peratt. The complimentary feature is also visible in space, with all the essential features present that were discovered in laboratory experiments.




The complimentary feature renders a Sun to be located at the node point between two plasma streams.




Each Sun has an in-flowing plasma stream, and an out-flowing stream. The portion of the plasma stream that the Sun consumes for its atomic synthesis, which also creates light and heat, keeps the plasma streams flowing. Without that movement nothing would happen.






This means that every sun is located at a node point between interstellar plasma streams. The principle of interstellar plasma steams is reflected in the stars being lined up often into easily recognizable long strings, like beads on a thread.




The same node-point creating process also happens much closer to the Sun itself. It is here, where the principle that crates node points becomes critical for the formation of planets, because wherever node points form, plasma is either consumed, or it simply spills out into space. When it spills into space, it sets a process in motion to leads to the formation of a plasma sphere that eventually becomes the core for a planet. That's, evidently, how planets are started.




Question #2 Why do planets form around a plasma sphere, exclusively?




One of the features of our Sun is that it emits solar winds. The solar wind is a wind of plasma that is electrically accelerated away from the Sun up to roughly 800 Km /second.

The solar wind is eventually stopped, probably by another magnetic feature of the Primer Fields.




Where the solar wind stops, it forms a shell of plasma around the Sun and its planets. This shell of plasma that surrounds the entire solar system, is termed, the heliosphere. However, the plasma doesn't remain there. It flows back onto the Sun in a thin sheet that is termed the heliospheric current sheet. The current sheet flows in the ecliptic plane, probably magnetically guided by the Primer Fields. This plain happens to be also the plane of the planetary orbits.

And here it gets interesting. The current sheet is not exempted from the magnetic pinching process.




As the plasma current flows in the heliospheric current sheet towards the Sun, it becomes subjected to the magnetic pinching effect and forms node points. However, with the plasma now flowing in an flat sheet towards the Sun, rather than in streams, the pinching effect forms node rings of concentrated plasma around the Sun, rather than node points.

When a ring of plasma breaks apart at its weakest point, the disconnected segments become drawn together by electric effects and form a sphere of plasma that remains aligned with the node rings.

Since plasma has mass, we have a core mass established by this process that is actually able to gravitationally attract atomic elements to it that are flowing in space, that flow from the Sun, that were synthesized by the Suns, that are carried in the solar wind. The attracted atomic elements, however, are not absorbed into the plasma sphere, but ride on its surface. Over time, they form an encapsulating shell around the plasma sphere.




A large plasma sphere has its highest mass-density at its surface, rather than at its center as it would be the case for a sphere of atomic material that is electrically neutral.




Plasma is made up of tiny electrons, and of 1,000-times larger protons. The two types attract each other by the electric force. By this attraction the lighter electrons swarm around the heavy protons. They become attracted to the protons. But before they latch on, they become repelled again, only to be attracted anew. They are thus drawn into an endless dance.




However, in a large plasma sphere, where gravity and the electrons' repulsion of one another plays a role, the lighter electrons tend to migrate to the surface.




The migration, causes the thereby less-swarmed protons at the center of the plasma sphere to be less electrically-isolated. Consequently, they repel each other more.




The inverse happens on the surface of the plasma sphere where the electrons migrate to. There, the mutually repelling force of the protons is strongly reduced by the more densely swarming electrons that shield the protons from each other. The reduced repelling force enables high-density mass concentrations to form on the surface of the plasma sphere. The mass concentration becomes so dense that atomic elements cannot penetrate it.




Atomic elements are typically 100,000-times larger that sum of their parts. The plasma's mass density at the surface of a large plasma sphere is so great that it far exceeds that of atoms.




This means that all atomic structures ride on the surface of the plasma sphere that is the core of the Earth, like ships are riding on the sea.




Even the heaviest atomic elements that become gravitationally attracted from the solar wind, would accumulate outside the plasma sphere that is the core of the Earth.




Over time, the accumulations build up into layers. The layers form the crust and mantle of the Earth. The mainstream model is correct in this. The mainstream model becomes useful if one regards the core of the Earth to be a sphere of plasma, rather than being a metallic sphere of mostly iron.




But what about the mantle of magma, which lays between the core and the crust?

It appears that this layer was synthesized by the Earth itself, with its own plasma-fusion reactions that would be natural on the high density surface of its plasma core.

Because a large sphere of plasma has its greatest electron density and its greatest proton density, on its surface, with free-flowing electrons being highly active there, it is extremely likely that atomic synthesis takes place at such a hyper active surface,




 like on the surface of the Sun, though far less intense than on the Sun.

 




Our plasma Sun is not much different in principle. It too, has a plasma sphere at its core, and a mantle around it where all the actions are happening, where plasma is forged into atomic elements that are created so highly energized that they emit light and heat.






The same happens on Earth, only further away from the surface. There is evidently sufficient heat being generated deep within the Earth, in this plasma-fusion process by the core of the Earth, that it powers the heating of the mantle in a continuously active process. If it wasn't for this synthesizing fusion process that eats up plasma, the Earth would be choked to death by it.




There is so much plasma flowing into the Earth, that the atmosphere turns green by its interaction with it, mostly in the high latitude regions.




While the intensity varies depending on specific solar actions, the vast inflow of plasma would accumulate if it was not consumed by the intensely electric actions on the surface of the plasma core deep within the Earth.




The Sun maintains itself in the same manner. However, when the in-flow exceeds what the Sun can handle, enormously large plasma eruptions occur, like volcanoes on the Sun.




Everything happens outside the core, in the thin mantel called the photosphere, where all the actions happen.




Big actions often leave behind holes in the active photosphere.






 Large eruptions can blow out large masses of plasma into space. We call the plasma mass ejections, solar flairs. They often affect us on our nearby Earth.




The Earth doesn't have the flaring option to get rid of excess plasma. Nor does it need to. The core of our Earth appears to be able to eat up in synthesizing fusion whatever the Sun sends our way. The in-flowing plasma seems to make its way to the core where it becomes converted into magma. I don't think we know how large our plasma core presently is. It probably is larger than we imagine it to be, for it to be as efficient as it is. A plasma sphere can vary enormously in size and overall mass density.






For example, the high-mass brown-dwarf star WISE1828 is believed to have a 50 times greater mass than Jupiter, all contained in the same volume as Jupiter. This star thereby has a mass density that is 12 times greater than that of the Earth, which has the highest mass density of all the planets. This extreme mass density of the brown dwarf can only be achieved with an electron-rich, densely packed plasma sphere.




On the other end of the extreme, the giant star UY Scuti is 5 billion times larger in volume than our Sun is, but it contains only a 10 times larger mass. This miniscule mass is spread out into a thin, dense layer that forms the surface of this star's core.




This super-light giant star, that comes close to being a vacuum inside, nevertheless outshines our Sun 340,000-fold, with its larger surface.




It is highly likely that the plasma core of the Earth is larger in size than the Earth's core is believed to be in mainstream science. The high mass density of the Earth, that may have given rise to the iron core theory, can easily be created with an electron-rich core, regardless of its size.




The high sensitivity of the Earth to changing solar cosmic-ray flux, in terms of resulting volcanic eruptions and earthquakes, suggests that we have a fairly large plasma core within the Earth.

This also means that we have a fairly large Sun active within the Earth, though one that is far less energetic than the big Sun is. Consequently, the atomic elements that are synthesized within the Earth by the core, are of lesser complexity.




The atomic elements that are synthesized within the Earth would comprise mostly the simple atoms on the alpha chain, ranging from hydrogen atoms upwards to iron, and not much beyond that.

The result is, that the oil and gas that we consume in our cars, appear to have been synthesized within the Earth, including some of the oxygen that we breathe, the nitrogen in the air, and the water for our oceans.

We know that the atomic synthesis extends as far as iron, because all known magmas that comprise the mantle of the Earth are molecular combinations of oxygen, silicone, magnesium, and iron.

In contrast, the far heavier elements, like uranium, that we find within the crust of the Earth, were evidently synthesized on the surface of the Sun, and were carried abroad with the soar wind.

A part of our air and water was likely also derived from the Sun, which produces the elements in abundance, that make up our air and oceans.




The bottom line is, that the oil and gas that bubble up from deep within the Earth, appear to be continuously produced by the Earth itself.




Gas and oil consist of various types of combinations of hydrogen and carbon, which are among the most-easily synthesized atoms.

Thus, Oil and Gas are actually a self-renewing resource, produced in the Earth in a process that is nurtured by solar dynamics. It may therefore exist in vastly larger quantities than we generally imagine.




The dual creative process that builds the Earth up from the outside with atomic fallout from the Sun, and from the inside with atomic synthesis, yields a perfect reason for the dramatic difference in composition that exists between the crust of the Earth and the mantle of the Earth. No other process or theory about the makeup of the Earth and planets yields a reason for the known dramatic difference. Only the Plasma-Core principle furnishes a valid reason why exclusively the crust contains the extremely heavy elements up to gold, led, and uranium, which are not present in the mantle.




With the Sun and the Earth both operating on basically the same principle of plasma-powered atomic synthesis, though at vastly different energy levels, the atomic fusion process is nevertheless evident in both cases, through with a difference.




On the Sun the fusion products are purged away from the Sun by the solar wind, while within the Earth, the fusion products accumulate.




Nothing flows away from the Earth. As the synthesized material accumulates, the accumulation expands the mantle. It often breaks through the crust with volcanic explosions. It has done this for a long time.




Volcanoes are a necessary feature of the Earth that is growing from within.

Volcanoes likely have erupted for as long as the Earth has existed. The synthesized fusion products from the core, necessarily lift the mantle up and break through it.




Question #3 What is building up pressure within the plasma core?




Another factor that puts outward pressure onto the mantle, is the expansion of the core itself. When solar cosmic-ray flux is increasing, as has been the case in a big way since the 1990s, the increasing proton inflow into the Earth apparently extends all the way to the core and increases the protons' outward pressure.




Because the center of the core of the Earth consists largely of protons, and the protons repel each other by the electric force, the increasing proton density in the core, by increased cosmic-ray flux, increases the repulsion pressure of the protons in the core.




The influx of protons would thereby cause the core to expand and put pressure on everything sounding it.




By its electric nature, the Earth core pressure is inherently a variable factor that is mostly affected by solar cosmic-ray flux, because cosmic-ray flux consists up to 90% of high-energy protons. A portion of the cosmic-ray flux evidently reaches all the way to the core, because whenever large increases of cosmic-ray flux occur, dramatic increases in earthquakes and volcanic eruptions happen.




In times of high volumes of cosmic-ray flux, the increased proton density in the core causes the core to expand. It literally becomes inflated. When this expansion happens rapidly, the increased pressure against the crust of the Earth causes all sorts of dramatic effects.




Increased Earthquakes and increased volcanic eruptions, are only some of the effects, though the most obvious effects.




The lifting of the surface in some areas is another effect.

This is what see now happening evermore, as we are getting deeper into the boundary zone to the next Ice Age, where solar activity gets weaker and more of the Sun's cosmic-ray protons reach the earth. And we really do see dramatic evidence that the plasma core is expanding.




When we see this gigantic caldera of Yellowstone, that lays 9,000 feet high, rising by a third of a meter in only four to five years, then we see evidence that some huge forces are pushing had from below. Those forces, evidently, come from the core expanding, which responds to solar cosmic-ray increasing, which in turn reflects the evermore diminishing solar activity that is normal in the boundary zone to the Ice Age phase shift in the 2050s that we are in and cannot back out of, but need to respond to.




We have measured the solar cosmic-ray flux increasing at an average rate of 20% per decade, with variations in between that follow the solar cycles.

Evidence that the expansion of the core is linked with solar cosmic-ray flux, is found in the case of the uplifting of the caldera of the long extinct Yellowstone super-volcano. The uplifting of the caldera began in 2004 at the time when the cosmic-ray flux began to increase.




Between 2004 and 2008, the entire caldera of the Yellowstone super-volcano, that spans 72 km wide, was pushed upwards from below. The rate of uplift was measured at the amazing rate of 7.6 cm/year. The rate has been less in later years, while the uplift still continues.




If this entire area, which was an active volcano several times, explodes again in our time, it's game-over for humanity. The ash that it would inject into the stratosphere would encircle the Earth for decades and blot out a portion of the sunshine. It would largely disable agriculture worldwide for many years. In this time of massively reduced sunshine, most of humanity would starve to death.

While the chances are slim that is volcano will blow any time soon, we need to prepare ourselves as if it would, because the potential cannot be ignored.

For example, a major earthquake along the San Andreas fault, could cause a sufficient shock to trigger the increasingly stressed Yellowstone volcano.




We need to protect our food supply by building us a new world with large-scale indoors agriculture that makes us climate independent. While the scope of the project is gigantic, it can be as easily accomplished with automated industrial processes that generate floating modules stung across the sea. These modules can be as easily mass produced as egg cartons are mass-produced by the millions. Only the scale of the project is somewhat larger, but far from being impossible.




We need to build this new world fast, because the pressure from below the Earth is fast increasing, and the cosmic-ray flux that is driving the process that creates the pressure, is increasing at a rate of 20% per decade with no end in sight.

This rate of increase is real. It has been measured in space and on the ground. This means that big eruptions lay ahead of us that we need to protect our living against. These eruption may become bigger than anything we have experienced in recent time. And what we have experienced, was big.




In the brief period in which the the Yellowstone up-lift had begun, in 2004, until the solar cosmic-ray flux had levelled off in 2011, a large number of extreme world-historic seismic events have happened.




This however, leads into Segment 2 of the series, which explores the evidence of the link between solar cosmic-ray flux and volcanic and seismic activity.

Home page

Please consider a donation - Thank You

Published by Cygni Communications Ltd. North Vancouver, BC, Canada - (C) in public domain - producer Rolf A. F. Witzsche